Posted by 
By Pamela S. Karlan
Pamela S. Karlan is a distinct determine in American legislation. A professor at Stanford legislations institution and previous information for the NAACP, she has argued seven instances at the ultimate court docket and labored on dozens extra as a clerk for Justice Harry Blackmun. In her first publication written for a normal viewers, she examines what occurs in American courtrooms -- specifically the perfect courtroom -- and what it skill for our daily lives and to our nationwide commitments to democracy, justice, and equity.
Through an exploration of present hot-button felony matters -- from vote casting rights to the dying penalty, well-being care, same-sex marriage, invasive high-tech searches, and gun regulate -- Karlan makes a cosmopolitan and resonant case for her imaginative and prescient of the structure. on the center of that imaginative and prescient is the conviction that the structure is an evolving rfile that permits executive to remedy novel difficulties and extend the sector of human freedom. As skeptics cost congressional overreach on such matters because the reasonable Care Act or even balloting rights, Karlan pushes again. On person rights specifically, she believes the structure permits Congress to implement the substance of its amendments. and she or he calls out the Roberts courtroom for its disdain for the opposite branches of presidency and for its alignment with a conservative agenda.
Read or Download A Constitution for All Times PDF
Similar constitutional law books
No Price Too High: Victimless Crimes and the Ninth Amendment
Hardaway argues the criminalization of victimless crimes violates the 9th modification to the U. S. structure and creates huge, immense public coverage difficulties within the society. He contends that the 9th modification adjudication version and the ideas of self-determination and the damage precept are the criteria to which privateness concerns may be litigated.
Rousseau, Law and the Sovereignty of the People
Including Plato's Republic, Jean-Jacques Rousseau's Social agreement is considered essentially the most unique examples of utopian political engineering within the heritage of rules. just like the Republic, Rousseau's masterwork is best recognized this present day for its author's idiosyncratic view of political justice than its classes on lawmaking or governance in any concrete feel.
Emergency Powers in Asia: Exploring the Limits of Legality
What's the relevance of up to date debates over emergency powers for nations located in Asia? What function does, and will, the structure play in constraining those powers? The essays during this assortment deal with those matters, drawing on emergency occasions in over 20 nations in Asia as a ready-made laboratory for exploring the connection among emergency powers and constitutionalism.
Constitutionalism and the Rule of Law: Bridging Idealism and Realism
Rule of legislation and constitutionalist beliefs are understood by way of many, if no longer such a lot, as essential to create a simply political order. Defying the conventional department among normative and confident theoretical methods, this ebook explores how political fact at the one hand, and constitutional beliefs at the different, at the same time tell and effect one another.
- Das allgemeine Verwaltungsrecht als Ordnungsidee: Grundlagen und Aufgaben der verwaltungsrechtlichen Systembildung
- Causation
- Prisoners' Self Help Litigation Manual (4th Edition)
- Separating Powers: International Law before National Courts
- Sovereignty, Emergency, Legality
Additional resources for A Constitution for All Times
Sample text
Karlan urged the Supreme Court to strike the Act down, calling it “anathema” to what he acknowledged as “fundamental” constitutional guarantees of liberty. Similarly, local legislators have passed ordinances denying undocumented immigrants the right to live or work in their communities, despite the fact that the Constitution clearly grants control over immigration to the federal government. And the repeated history of states passing restrictive abortion laws that cannot possibly survive judicial review reflects the worst form of political grandstanding.
But the constitutional question was not whether Congress’s judgment was correct; rather, it was whether Congress’s judgment was rational. In this regard, the many prizewinning economists who agree with Congress are enough to justify its decision. And yet the Supreme Court held that the law lay outside the commerce power. ) The five Justices who thought Congress had gone beyond its commerce power saw a constitutionally significant difference between the individual mandate and all prior law: the mandate, they argued, regulates inactivity—the refusal to buy insurance—rather than something people are already doing, such as growing wheat or marijuana.
Maybe Congress was wrong about these empirical judgments. I don’t know; I’m just a law professor. But the constitutional question was not whether Congress’s judgment was correct; rather, it was whether Congress’s judgment was rational. In this regard, the many prizewinning economists who agree with Congress are enough to justify its decision. And yet the Supreme Court held that the law lay outside the commerce power. ) The five Justices who thought Congress had gone beyond its commerce power saw a constitutionally significant difference between the individual mandate and all prior law: the mandate, they argued, regulates inactivity—the refusal to buy insurance—rather than something people are already doing, such as growing wheat or marijuana.